When is a home considered marital property?

Unravel the complexities around the marital home in a Florida divorce with our comprehensive guide. Secure your future by understanding your rights.

During a Florida divorce, what happens to the marital home can be a cause for significant concern. This detailed guide aims to demystify the treatment of the marital home in a Florida divorce, giving you the essential knowledge you need.

In Florida, Courts will divide the marital assets and liabilities 50/50 between the couple unless there are factors that would make an equal split inequitable. The home will be subject to equitable distribution if it is determined to be a marital asset.

When is the Home considered a marital asset?

In general, an asset acquired during the marriage is presumed to be marital, regardless of whether it was acquired or incurred by one spouse alone or by both spouses together. See Fla. Stat. §61.075; see also, Pfleger v. Pfleger, 558 So. 2d 198, 199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Buttner v. Buttner, 484 So. 2d 1265, 1266 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

Further, real property held by spouses as tenants by the entireties is presumed to be a marital asset, regardless of whether the property was acquired prior to or during the marriage.

Does your name appear on the title to the property? This should be the first thing you should check.

When is the Home considered a nonmarital asset?

A home may be classified as a nonmarital asset if one spouse acquired it prior to the marriage and the other spouse’s name is not on the title.

Use of nonmarital property as a marital home is not enough to establish the property as a marital asset. Hooker v. Hooker, 174 So. 3d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citing Embry v. Embry, 650 So. 2d 190, 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)), reversed on other grounds, 220 So. 3d 397 (2017).

For example, in a Florida case, a wife in a divorce action was claiming an interest in the home owned by the husband. The wife argued that her husband intended on gifting the property and that she believed she owned the home with the husband because it was a family home where they lived. The Court found otherwise. The most significant factors defeating the wife’s claim of donative intent (intent to gift) regarding interest in the home were that: (1) she was never liable on loans pertaining to the property; and (2) her name was never included on any documents evidencing actual ownership of the property, even though the husband had multiple opportunities to acknowledge any interest he intended her to have. [see Hooker v. Hooker, 174 So. 3d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), reversed on other grounds, 220 So. 3d 397 (2017).

However, the lack of a spouse’s name on official documents regarding property is not dispositive of the gift issue, and donative intent may be established by other evidence. Further, even if a spouse is named on documents pertaining to property, that evidence is not sufficient to establish an interspousal transfer without other evidence of donative intent. See Kuebler v. Kuebler, 131 So. 2d 211, 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961).

Next step:

If the home is determined to be a marital asset, the next step would be deciding on how the interest, if any, will be divided. You and your spouse can reach an agreement as to how the interest in the home will be divided. The Court will decide what to do with the home if you and your spouse cannot reach an agreement. In most cases, the Court will order the home to be sold.

Taking that into consideration, it is important to chose an agent that understands what you are going through during this difficult time.

Conclusion

If you have questions about what is considered marital property, it’s best to ask a qualified family attorney. Schedule a consultation with one of our attorneys today to review the issues of your case, the legal options you may have, and certain rights that pertain to your unique situation.

Have more questions? Let us know by sending an email to: questions@legallotus.com and we will do our best to develop content to provide you with direction and insight!

For more information: 
Check out and subscribe to our YouTube Channel
Follow us on Instagram
Like us on Facebook
Visit our website 
Shop our Legal Templates 

No Attorney-Client Relationship or Legal Advice: Communication of information by, in, to or through this Website and your receipt or use of it: (1) is not provided in the course of and does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship; (2) is not intended as a solicitation; (3) is not intended to convey or constitute legal advice; and (4) is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. You should not act upon any such information without first seeking qualified professional counsel on you specific matter. The hiring of an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely upon Web site communications or advertisements. Feel free to contact us if you need legal assistance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from Legal Lotus

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading